Is It Selfish to Be “Selfish”?
- Nurit Weiss

- Jun 14
- 4 min read

We usually hear the word selfish and immediately feel something negative.
A selfish person is often described as someone who only thinks about themselves, puts their own needs above everyone else's, takes without giving, or manipulates situations for personal gain.
The word has become almost synonymous with greed, self-centeredness, and a lack of compassion.
But I keep wondering: why did this word become so one-sided?
Somewhere along the way, caring for ourselves and caring only for ourselves became tangled together, as though they were the same thing. Yet they feel very different to me.
Can someone truly give love if they've never learned how to give it to themselves first?
When a person feels empty inside, giving can sometimes come with an invisible expectation attached. Not always consciously. Often, they genuinely want to help, support, or love another person. Yet underneath the giving, there may be a quiet hope of receiving something in return - a sense of appreciation, validation, recognition, affection, or simply the feeling of being needed.
It's understandable. When we're disconnected from ourselves, we naturally look outside of ourselves to fill what feels missing within.
Giving from that place can become exhausting. Over time, resentment can appear. Disappointment follows when others don't respond the way we hoped. The more we depend on others to complete us, the heavier relationships can feel.
But when someone is deeply connected to themselves, giving feels different.
It doesn't feel like a transaction.
It doesn't come with a hidden contract.
It doesn't create a silent scorecard of who gave what to whom.
There is a natural flow to it because there is already enough inside.
The love isn't being pulled from an empty well. It's overflowing from a full one.
This is one of the things I find myself reflecting on more and more. We are often taught to think of others before ourselves. We are taught to be helpful, generous, accommodating, productive, and available. Yet very few of us are taught how to sit quietly with ourselves and build a genuine relationship with our own inner world.
We're rarely shown how to listen to ourselves.
How to understand ourselves.
How to care for ourselves without guilt.
How to become emotionally independent without becoming emotionally closed off.
Sometimes I wonder what would change if people were encouraged to take full responsibility for their own inner state first.
What if self-awareness was considered just as important as self-sacrifice?
What if people learned that their peace, worth, and happiness were not things that had to be earned from the outside?
Would we still seek so much validation from others?
Would we still depend so heavily on external approval to feel valuable?
Would we still hand over so much power to systems, institutions, social expectations, or other people's opinions?
Think about it. Can you predict what world we would live in?
I remember one of the first times I experienced automatic writing as a teenager.
At the time, I didn't really understand what was happening. It simply felt as though something was moving through me faster than my thinking mind could keep up with. The words flowed onto the page without the usual process of carefully constructing each sentence.
When I finished, I looked down at what I had written.
One line stood out clearly from everything else:
"Love yourself first."
I remember staring at those words for a long time, thinking.. who wrote this?
In many ways, they felt like something I already knew.
Something familiar.
Something that had always been there beneath the surface, waiting to be fully recognized.
The experience stayed with me because it felt like a reminder rather than a revelation.
A reminder of something we often forget.
Life moves quickly. We spend our days thinking, planning, reacting, achieving, solving problems, meeting responsibilities, and chasing goals. There is nothing wrong with any of that. But when life becomes constant motion, it becomes easy to lose contact with the deeper parts of ourselves.
The quiet parts.
The observing parts.
The parts that aren't trying to prove anything.
There is a deeper layer of awareness within all of us. It doesn't usually demand attention. It doesn't compete with the noise of the world. It waits patiently beneath the surface, offering insight whenever we're willing to become still enough to listen.
And when we begin connecting with that place, something shifts,
We stop searching for love in places that can never fully provide it.
We stop expecting other people to define our value.
We stop relying on external approval to tell us who we are.
We become less shaken when people disappoint us, misunderstand us, reject us, or fail to show up in the ways we hoped they would.
It's not that we stop caring or
become detached.
Our foundation no longer depends entirely on what exists outside of us.
The relationship we have with ourselves becomes stronger.
More stable.
More honest.
More real.
And from that place, love becomes less about seeking and more about sharing.
We become the source rather than the search.
Perhaps this is why the idea of being "selfish" deserves a second look.
Not the kind of selfishness that ignores others.
Not the kind that takes without consideration.
Not the kind that places personal gain above human connection.
But the kind that recognizes that caring for yourself is not a betrayal of others.
The kind that understands that self-love and self-respect create the foundation from which genuine love can grow.
A person who has learned to love themselves deeply doesn't become less capable of loving others.
They often become more capable.
Their love becomes freer.
Cleaner.
Less dependent.
Less fearful.
More abundant.
So maybe "selfish" isn't the problem.
Maybe the meaning we've attached to it is.
Maybe there are times when choosing yourself isn't selfish at all.
It's necessary.
And it means learning to love yourself first - fully, honestly, and without apology.




Comments